Why not?
Why can't we question science? Why can't we question narratives? Why can't we post opinions that differ from each other? What happened to "I Love America -The Land of the Free?"
People start losing their minds when their rights are trampled on… until they don’t realize it, and then they usher it in.
We are being told to be silent on so many topics lately.
In other countries, people are being arrested for social media posts.
In our country, people are being swatted or doxed for their opinions.
In the whole world, tensions are high, and no one is being told the truth by “the authorities,” and that’s concerning.
We used to think that “they” were smarter than us, and even if they did things that seemed evil, there was more to the story, and we had to trust the process.
But “They” taught us the scientific method and how to formulate a hypothesis and question the death out of it until we call it a theory, conclusion, or fact. So why are “they” telling us to “trust the science” that doesn’t add up and to “stop questioning and trust the doctors” that don’t take their own medicine, vaccines, or food, and have boats while we try to buy groceries?
Why can’t we question that?
Why do some people seem to walk up a success ladder as if it’s painted on the ground, and others can’t find the first rung if it was attached to their foot… and neither one is dependent on skillset or ability or drive.
Why is someone who says they lost a best friend looking into that best friend’s murder, showing evidence they’re finding in real-time discovery and being transparent, and the very company that said best friend started and other operatives are telling this podcaster to stop being a bad friend and to trust the authorities, who have lied at least four times…. WHY? Why are we supposed to BLINDLY TRUST anyone now when we were taught our whole lives to never trust a stranger, never trust an evil corporation that is being bad to our environment, never trust a billionaire who wants to depopulate our world… and now they’re running our governments?
Why, when we ask ChatGPT random questions about a certain country’s central intelligence agencies, does it say that they are known to be the assassination branch of the world?
Why, speaking of ChatGPT, did no one watch Sam Altman’s tucker carlson interview and discuss his thoughts on whether “ChatGPT condone suicide or aid in assisted suicide instructions” and how in other countries it is legal to have assisted suicide, so really it’s just acting like Google when it provides information on how and where…. and the akward exchange between him and Tucker about the former ChatGPT employee who was found murdered in his apartment after coming home from a vacation and ordering food— it was labeled a suicide and people pointed fingers at the execs for many reasons…… Tucker asks Sam about that point blank, and it’s an odd exchange.
Where are the cops in all of these discussions? It seems that the detectives of the past who spent their time doing what podcasters do now would be hanging onto the breath of these podcasters who have enlisted their army of researchers to comb the globe for footage, and it produces way more than the three-letter agencies seem to produce…. I mean, given the narratives and talks being discussed, and the evidence being presented that isn’t real or true, or has oddities that are hard to believe.
Why?